Showing posts with label The Other side of the wind. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Other side of the wind. Show all posts

A Time for Resurrection

There was a piece published a bit ago in the Washington Post about the death of a streaming service. Filmstruck offered a lot of canonical titles and a smattering of true, worthy rarities from the history of art cinema and classic studio filmmaking. I couldn't afford it because I'm a movie critic but I have some fond memories of watching movies on the service in other people's apartments. It was a public good. I was happier knowing it was out there even if I couldn't use it. I steal most of the films I watch anyway because it's one of the only ways I can see the movies I need to see in order to write about them and afford rent. Sue me. You won't get a dime because I don't have one to give. Because I love movies. I make nothing singing their praises, spend what little I have making them and seeing them. They've taken everything from me but believe me when I say I've still got more to give. 

I'll never forsake the medium because we're in the middle of a 30 year conversation I happen to enjoy, even though while we were talking a huge portion of my life left my body. But this is what I love so it doesn't feel like a loss. Film talks to me and the movies talk to each other and they let me listen. Hirokazu Kore-Eda's Shoplifters and Deniz Gamze Ergüven's Kings prop each other up, their tales of makeshift families on society's margins merge to form one giant family. How do you say no to that? Adds a year to your life. That's why I was most excited to see Orson Welles' newly restored and truly towering meta-diary entry The Other Side of the Wind come back to life. I knew what that film was going to be, but seeing it was still so important. The thing can be imagined forever but only seen once, if you catch my drift. Imagining a Welles decision just doesn't hold a candle to seeing one and experiencing that ecstatic melancholy that only his edits and close-ups provide. Not merely because he was a profoundly talented director, one of the finest, born with a camera in his mind, but because Welles is almost metonymic with stolen vision. He tried, time and again, to give us the gift of art, and moneymen, audiences and critics alike turned up their noses like they'd get another artist like him. As of 2018 we're still waiting. 

The Other Side of the Wind is a cacophonous journey towards death. The death of film, of many careers, of film appreciation, of the mystery of art, of its creator, its stars and its chances of being completed. A film about itself, failing to become real. It's also a log flume ride into a bottle of whiskey, one of the finest portrayals of professional alcoholics ever made - more interesting and surreal than Clint Eastwood's White Hunter, Black Heart on roughly the same subjects. A man who staved off dysentery by accident because he only ever drank liquor playing a man who drank away every meaningful relationship he ever formed directed by a man who died penniless, knowing his legacy would be misused if we ever found it. This could only really have come out now (despite the fact that it could have come out literally decades ago if anyone with money had cared enough) because it happens to be a funhouse mirror with our image frozen in its cold glass surface. 

John Huston plays a director going to his own funeral, the guests just don't know it yet. He drinks and smokes and gives flippant, evasive answers to every question fired at him. His hangers-on watch him trundle through life like the giant in N.C. Wyeth's painting of the same name (the second time I've had recourse to mention this work this year), painted with their backs to us, staring in wonder at a man ten thousand feet tall. Their identities are fashioned in his reflection, their art never discussed without his name on any critic's tongue. That exposure chafes bad. Journalists are stuck asking third-rate Cahier-du-cinema-style questions, old friends are stuck in his shadow, and he's stuck in skin he doesn't recognize. He drinks, his lips purse like a chimpanzee's (Huston was gifted one on the occasion of his wedding to Evelyn Keyes and it trashed his apartment - an ominous sign of things to come. Monkeys know), and out spills a cagey taunt to beloved and hated alike blanketed in cigar smoke. The silken black-and-white coffin in which he finds himself is perhaps the best a Welles-image has ever looked. Even better than the gorgeous and purposely dated faux-nioni film Huston is directing and trying to find money for. Art imitated life. Welles spent years trying to find a home for his film. No one bit. Spielberg bought the Rosebud sleigh instead. Little did he know it was one of 12. Even the myth was a disappointment. 

The film is thus about the pieces everyone tries to grab from an unknowable artist. The tragedy was Welles never hid. He told Bogdanovich a story once about D.W. Griffith washing dishes at the Brown Derby or some such place in the 40s. Anyone who wanted to know how to make films just had to know which joint he was cleaning and go ask him, but no one cared, even as Birth of a Nation and Intolerance became the yin and yang of silent cinema. I'm not positive Welles knew when he died. He had his own troubles. And for them, he wound up washing dishes of his own, narrating bunk documentaries about Nostradamus, playing generals and dying pimps and fat robots. He was trying to hand back his crown of thorns and no one would take it. He was right there, arms open, if anyone wanted him. 

There's another rosebud in the razor-wire genius of The Other Side of the Wind, the perfect surface in his film-within-a-film. Bob Random, the Canadian heart-throb eating Huston's director alive from the inside like a cancer, plays a rich cypher who lied about being poor to get cast in his work. And just as soon as he joined the circus, he ran off in the middle of making the movie. Random's own career isn't extremely dissimilar. He worked for a few decades and then vanished. I could see Welles projecting a thousand things onto him. The beauty that changed with the times. He looks like a zillion mumbling beauties who graced the screen around then. His look was almost a type in-and-of-itself, square jaw, pouty lips, sad eyes, long curly hair. Maybe it's my mind playing tricks on me but I don't think he says a word in the whole movie. He's Welles inner beauty, the beautiful star he only got to be for a little while. The man full of promise who can't possibly deliver (he did, but no one told Welles that).

Perhaps that's why it was so shocking to see him barking threats in Budd Boetticher's final fiction film, A Time For Dying. Boetticher had a career about diametrically opposed to Welles'. He was a studio director who made cheap b-movies (some of our very best cheap b-movies, it begs pronouncement) who found himself in a unique position to become a kind of cult figure. He, producer Harry Joe Brown and star Randolph Scott collaborated on some of the finest westerns ever made. Seven Men From Now, Westbound, The Tall T, Ride Lonesome, Buchanan Rides Alone, Commanche Station, lean, poetic things. All beauty and clenched courage. Westerns were in a sort of a golden age, and even among such tall company they stand out. Scott retired in 1962 after making Ride The High Country, rightly believing few people would know what to do with him and his enormous image after that. Times were changing. Scott looked a hundred years old when he threw in the towel, you'd never guess he lived another 25 years from looking at him. Boetticher hung in after his star quit on him, but either no one wanted him or he didn't know what to do with anyone who did. 

Then it's 1969 and he decides to try one last Western before tossing in the sweat-soaked towel. A Time For Dying can be thought of as Boetticher's Psycho. It's got TV-budget sets and actors, it's discursive and seemingly easily distracted, it's got no real heroes, and it's darker than compost. Random plays a kid who's hooked up with Jesse James. James is played by Audie Murphy in his final screen performance, though he's really only got one scene - what they called a Guest Star back in the day. Murphy only really stands out because he seems like a star. It's not that he's any better than the rest of the cast - Random's got him beat for charisma, no mistake. He's just got that bigness; he smiles and you want to grab sunglasses. Random looks like a surfer who got lost and stumbled onto the set. He's electrifying, but it helps that the leads of the film - Richard Lapp and Anne Randall - just sit there waiting for the end credits. Randall's a posable doll in gingham skirts and Lapp looks like clay waiting for the sculptor. He looks like the Quay Brothers tried to make Barry Keoghan, got reasonably close and called it quits to get drunk. Lapp and Randall wind up married through no real fault of their own and so he's got to woo her after the fact with a display of his shooting skills. James and his gang are impressed and offer him a spot on the crew, while his courage sweats out of his body. Pay close attention to that sweat, it comes back. 

Boetticher by this point hasn't done much to indicate he's awake back there. Film kind of looks like a painting someone forgot to start so he tosses a bucket of red just before calling "Action!" But then the fucking strangest thing happens. Ebert called the film the "damndest" western he'd ever seen and I was starting to wonder what he meant until the final reel. Lapp challenges Random to a duel in the street, reasoning if he can't kill Jesse James he could at least kill his youngest disciple, and that ought to prove his mettle. Here's where it becomes clear Boetticher's been playing possum. Why would this hideous kid with a gorgeous, loving paramour for an accidental wife need to prove anything to anyone? He's just some bumpkin. James and his gang ride into silver city to raise hell and rob their bank and for a minute it kinda sorta looks like Lapp's going to stop them. Which is absurd. The James gang fell on hard times but they weren't stopped by some lumpen pipsqueak. And then he calls Random out and they're in the street, the movie's got 8 minutes left. It's got to go one way, you think, but the guns slip out of Lapp's hand and Random fucking kills him. Shoots him twice and then goes back and finishes him off with a shotgun. When Randall wakes up she's in the town whorehouse about to be groomed, and you know she knows it because her eyes go wide with terror just before the edit, just as another gal just like her rides into town on the stage and every man in a town cleaned out and shamed by Jesse James (who just saw a kid gunned down in the street) walks in after her. The charitable thing to do would be to burn the cathouse down with all of them inside of it, but Boetticher just watches 'em file in. Roll credits. Welcome to Hell. The 70s started the minute that movie ended. The damndest western ever made.

Boetticher and Welles knew before we did that their time was up, that they'd be misplaced, their memories dry cleaned for whatever rich schmo needed to compare himself to someone dead. Steve Bannon infamously tried to insert himself into Welles' The Chimes at Midnight in the middle of Errol Morris' punch-pulling American Dharma. The rich always see themselves as aggrieved. Boetticher and Welles were at their mercy and at least had the tact to not whine like drunken derelicts when their fortunes dried up. It was over. Welles, to his last, put on a good face ("I get to play a whole planet!" he chortled as he took his last paycheck to grace the Transformers movie) even as he knew it was over. Movies, which Welles understood better than anyone alive at the time of his death in the mid-80s (can you imagine dying in 1985?), had taken it all away from him. He was no longer as handsome or thin, no longer praised, his genius no longer whispered about by sibilant industry goons, his friends no longer coming to him for work or advice. His nest was empty and so were his coffers. Boetticher at least had fans tracking him down, reminding him he had done great work and he'd gotten to roll a grenade into the genre he'd helped perfect before he stopped. That had to count for something. Welles left a dozen projects hanging in the wind, whichever side, and then couldn't hang onto life anymore. Everything caught up with him. 

Strangest goddamn thing is that when I look at pictures of Welles just as he was starting to age, I see myself. We have similar facial features, our hair grows the same way, he seems to be looking at me with a knowing sort of grin. Is there a phrase for a face that ages like your own? An inverse Dorian Gray? A roadmap to your mortality? Naturally I'd change some of the contours, but I guess it's good to make peace with what life and the cinema CAN do to someone, just in case they decide to. But until I find myself voicing Unicron the eater of planets, the last stop before death as foretold by Nostradamus in the ancient book of prophecy, old when the seas drank Atlantis, I'll keep having the conversation because I know film will always answer back. 

Never Too Late

In Amir Bar-Lev’s excellent documentary Happy Valley, someone posits that the crowd at Penn State Games (and by extension, I’ll say rabid sports fans in general) are a crowd in search of something to rally behind. When Joe Paterno turned out to be less than the heroic figure they’d believed him to be, they quickly found another coach to deify. The words “anoint a new king” are used, which is telling. Americans are the loudest people in the world whose lives are completed by blind faith in figureheads. Conservative voters scream the loudest for the worst candidates. Watch the way that one man with a sign that says “Joe Paterno protected pedophiles” ignites so much hatred and violence in perfect strangers passing by. People used to make pilgrimages to a statue of Paterno to take pictures next to him. Then it was revealed that he’d helped cover up assistant coach Jerry Sandusky’s raping football players for years. And yet people still came to the statue. They’re understanding of him as a guy who’d helped football teams win overpowered whatever shred of moral obligation they felt to the dozens of young men whose lives had been ruined thanks to Saint Joe. Football came first.
Maybe cinephiles should thank the French (or just Andrew Sarris) for introducing the primacy of theory over the personalities behind movies to us. Critics will be quick to tell you that, for instance, Woody Allen’s movies are more important than anything Woody Allen has done in his personal life because we're not psychologists or ethics professors. Our job is to study the films and watching Manhattan is not equal to supporting what he did to his daughters. In the same way we don’t support Ted Hughes driving Sylvia Plath to suicide everytime we buy one of his poetry books. We also are up front about how fucking terrible our heroes can be as human beings. That's almost a given with geniuses of the arts. However, compare that to the general tone of most commenters under negative reviews of Marvel Comics movies or Quentin Tarantino films. Critics have the theory and can separate the people from the art they make. Criticize a Christopher Nolan movie that fans have not even seen yet, and you’ll see something akin to those pilgrims pushing and swearing at the lone man with the “Joe Paterno protected pedophiles” sign. “How dare you infer that the man who made The Dark Knight doesn’t know what he’s doing. The Dark Knight is the best movie ever and so, then, must Interstellar be kept from intellectuals who don’t understand what kind of movie he’s making this time out. You don’t get it.”

Something I know I’ve struggled with for the last few years is figuring out if the loyalty I feel towards the artists I love is the same way I love cousins I don’t see that often, or if I seriously believe they’re still good directors. Right around the time that The Counselor came out…or maybe it was just before Exodus, I don’t remember, I said that I believed Ridley Scott was one of the greatest filmmakers alive. Today, even after having seen what may wind up being his last good movie (not that I want it to be, but he’s getting on, ya know?) I may not be ready to stand by this claim. What changed? The things I prioritize in film. Pre-Prometheus he was my guy. Then I realized that just having an eye for visuals and an iron clad sense of dramatic pay offs wasn’t quite enough to make him special to me. Ridley gave me a lot of things, including my first memory of movies. He made me grow to love middle brow action films (and by turning Harrison Ford into a detective before anybody else could, he also accidentally invented them - The Fugitive, Patriot Games, The Devil’s Own) and, along with Terry Gilliam, he established the visual standard for mainstream western cinema. Combine the two and you get Alejandro González Iñárritu, David Fincher, Alfonso Cuarón, Guillermo Del Toro, Jean-Pierre Jeunet, Bong Joon-Ho, Tom Tykwer, The Wachowskis, and, yes, Chris Nolan. And I grew up worshipping at his altar. Alien, Blade Runner, Legend, Someone To Watch Over Me, Thelma & Louise, 1492, G.I. Jane, Gladiator, Hannibal, Black Hawk Down, Matchstick Men, American Gangster, Kingdom of Heaven... I stand by these movies (well except Gladiator). But I’ve come to see his that like any director he’s not infallible. He fucks up. He’s an old British man with old British prejudices. Occasionally he produces and directs like it’s 1965. Exodus, in particular, reminded me just how human he is. Which had a peculiar effect. Yes, it showed me he can cock up a movie just like anyone, but it kind of made reinvest in him. He’s made it this far, and if his daffy biblical epic (which I believe may have been a perfectly reasonable response to his brother’s suicide, but I’m doing that thing again. Protecting artists I don’t know personally because I have a personal attachment to their achievement) didn’t turn me off of him, than nothing can. Exodus can’t make Alien worse. Nothing can. These are facts, physical, tangible truths, and only our opinions can change. 

So it was with palpable excitement I sat down for The Martian. Everybody seemed to love it, there was Oscar talk for Christ’s sake, and even agnostics seemed to concede it wasn’t the worst thing they’d ever seen. And they’re all right. It’s a good movie. It’s fun. Ridley engages in playfulness, something he didn’t even try in his misbegotten, joyless romcom A Good Year. He has his most sombre astronaut, the Norwegian one, spinning and blowing kisses to his family in zero gravity, a beautiful few seconds in the middle of a montage set to a David Bowie song. Doesn’t that sound like a director rejuvenated to you? Or at least someone finally allowing themselves to have fun. To be different. It’s the fun he’s having that makes me forgive how fucking cute the script can be. Some of that dialogue is…not good. The nerd who wrote the book may have a great grip on the way nerds think, but he can’t write dialogue normal people would say to each other. It’s a long way from the shit-shooting and piss-taking of Alien’s wonderfully accurate blue-collar speak. Ridley has traded one for the other it seems. The believability is in his images and the survival of his lead, not the dialogue between earthlings, who I don’t think he has much interest in understanding anyway. 

What’s funny is that a rejuvenated Ridley looks like an awful lot like a young man who’s just seen Alien and Brazil. The Harry Gregson-Williams music apes Jerry Goldsmith's jittery trumpets early on as we get a god's eye view of the red planet and There’s a lot of Gilliam in Dariusz Wolski’s camera, the way it flies around corners to keep up with its hero’s progress. Ridley and Pietro Scalia burn through the dude’s year and a half in space, because psychological survival itself has never interested him (there's a great press conference where NASA head Jeff Daniels answers questions with blunt disinterest which sounds a lot like he's answering for the racial politics of Exodus and its subsequent box office failure). He likes it when people get fucked up real bad then get up and keep going. He likes his heroics in broad strokes. So we don’t check in on Matt Damon’s Mark Watney as he falls to pieces a la Into The Wild. That’s never been Ridley’s MO. So this is a film that is both right in his wheelhouse and a little more about exceptionalism as a positive force, instead of the thing that keeps you out of the frying pan just long enough to return to dust. He was a colonial critic for a lotta years, but he seems to have let that slide off him a little bit as he’s gotten older. Maybe realised the inherent contradiction in a British millionaire telling everyone about the evils of capitalism and empire building. But The Martian is the kindest he’s been to tourists since A Good Year. Mars doesn’t beat Watney or the governments he represents. It just lets everyone know they’ll have to do better to earn their place there. Doesn’t sound like the guy who gave up Jerusalem or punished soldiers for setting foot in Somalia, no matter how resilient they turned out to be. 
So if this is the way Ridley has to be in order to keep making movies with elephantine payoffs, that’s fine with me, because he couldn’t have kept making films the way he used to. Just look at Robin Hood. His old method had run its course. But it’s still not what it might have been. There’s no way around that. And Ridley Scott isn’t our greatest living filmmaker, even if he’s made some of my favourite films and may do so again. But I couldn’t help thinking about how much even something as rock solid as The Martian had nothing on one of my favourite dead filmmakers, given the same premise. A person marooned in a hostile environment, and the efforts of a few people coming to the rescue. A few weeks ago I went to the Museum of Modern Art and saw Orson Welles’ long-thought-lost (by me, anyway) The Deep. It’s only a work print, so most of the sound is bad temp ADR or indecipherable wild sound, the colour comes in and out and looks faded at best, and some scenes are made up of every take Welles captured on set. But it’s still probably the most thrilling movie I saw this year.

If you’ve seen Philip Noyce’s Dead Calm (a fine, if totally nutso movie, halfway between polite Noyce and Blind Fury Noyce) you know the story, kinda. Charles Williams’ novel has a few more snags than Noyce and George Miller’s adaptation. When the married couple (Oja Kodar and Michael Bryant) are separated by the lunatic seaman (Laurence Harvey, never more obviously a gay man playing straight) Bryant has company on the sinking ship on which he’s abandoned. Welles (a beach ball with arms) and Jeanne Moreau were left for dead when Harvey went off the deep end. Harvey, in his paranoid fugue, thought wife Moreau was fooling around with captain Welles. The absurdity of that to everyone but Welles does wonders for the audience gauging the progress of Harvey’s deteriorating cranium. Harvey plays his character like a cowboy without a horse, all sharpened good ol' boy mannerisms. He sounds like he miiiight have been trying to play it Tennessee Williams, but it's truly the strangest thing, especially because with no background noise, his purring "nah nah Mizzez Ingrim" speech patterns nearly deafen you. It's his worst performance, but it feels kind of at home in this treacherous blotchy world of Welles. Harvey likely didn't have time to clean it up because he was busy making Night Gallery and Night Watch, shooting his proper directorial debut Welcome to Arrow Beach, and dying. Welles wouldn't bother returning to the film after Harvey departed. And though it's truly insane misjudged work, you don't ever feel that Welles didn't trust Harvey and wouldn't have made it work if things had worked out.

The cramped location - two boats on the high seas - ignites Welles’ imagination. He never has trouble deciding the best way to utilize every inch of the vessels. His framing is marvelous, bidding us imagine the dimensions of his set to be larger than they are simply through withholding certain corners. The patchy print MoMA screened takes about twenty minutes to settle into, then you stop noticing the problems, and, if you’ve seen enough Welles, you fill in the blanks with what you know he would have done. Stefan Droessler from the Munich Filmmuseum presented the film, and would talk us through missing pieces or silent patches. He sounded like Werner Herzog, which made the whole thing much feel like a hybrid of church and cinema with its premiere sage offering us guidance in the darkness. Even deprived final cut Welles was the best. I was riveted waiting for the final confrontation between Harvey, Bryant and Welles, which I knew was going to be ugly. There’s a sequence, probably the longest in the film, where Bryant has Welles and Moreau help him set the boat ablaze to get Kodar’s attention across the the horizon. They run out of flammable liquid real fast and resort to paint. So for ten minutes we watch the three of them gleefully splashing different coats of paint all over the deck. Which would have looked great if the colour of the film had been preserved, but its bizarre installation loop feeling paints it for us. I thought for a brief second maybe Welles hadn’t filmed an ending and we’d just watch them throw buckets of paint until the house lights came up. And I wouldn’t have minded. As it stands the shot where the film’s villain is meant to be dispatched was missing, so he’s just gently edited out of the movie, a tragically fitting end to the final semi-completed work of America’s greatest director. If they never finish The Other Side of the Wind, then this will be the closest we get to Welles’ last finished film. Ridley is older now than Welles was when he died, and it’s nice to know he can still try new things, but it’s funny to think how innately cinematic Welles’ imagination stayed even as he kept having his projects forcefully aborted. Ridley has the luxury (not to mention the money, which eluded Welles for most of his working life) to keep experimenting. Orson wasn’t so lucky. But both are proof that you should never give up on artists just yet, even if they appear to reject your easy narratives. I’m rooting for the art of both of these men to continue to be discovered and funded because no matter who they were as people, their work has been with me all my life.