I think it would be fun to run the whole fucking world

There is almost nothing left to say about Martin Scorsese but lord knows we're all trying. Read a sampling of positive reviews of The Wolf of Wall Street and it becomes apparent very quickly that some of our best and brightest are having a heck of a time articulating why they liked it. We had a good year, hell, a great year, for film, but there's a difference in degrees between the purity of our cinematic experience. Let's turn to that other great capitalist Grimm fairy tale Breaking Bad, and equate Cinema to meth for a moment. Scorsese and his editor Thelma Schoonmaker, who always adds a little of the blue-eyed immediacy of her late husband Michael Powell to the proceedings, invented a kind of American cinema that essentially crushed up and snorted The French and Czech New Waves, Hitchcock, technicolor Hollywood musicals, Sub-saharan African & Middle-Eastern movies, Silent film, Italian Neo-Realism, German Expressionism and the political European cinema that flourished in and around 1968. Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, After Hours, The Color of Money and finally Goodfellas turned the 'American dream' and the experiences of immigrants, veterans and criminals into heart-attacks of diced genre tropes and smashed symbolism. The point was getting from the top to the bottom, missing and winding up back at the bottom. The journey consisted of any and every trick Scorsese and Schoonmaker were capable of trying, the speed getting faster and faster and faster until it can't possibly keep it up. Tellingly, he slowed way down after Goodfellas. Casino and Age of Innocence brim with similarly manic, passionate energy, but they're far more subdued. The heat and anger is below the surface where we can't always get at it. The way we think of the great man talking is a mile a minute because for years that was how he and his movies spoke. He'd learn to slow down and narrate his own story in a series of autobiographical essay films and prove to us that he hadn't strictly been making it up as he went. He had to slow down and take a breath. After all, how could cinema go much faster than Goodfellas?
Everyone tried to find out. It's almost impossible to name directors who don't owe him something, who didn't try to be him at some point. American Hustle, a smart, funny movie with, I would argue, a distinct voice is still basically a feature length adaptation of the famous Copacabana tracking shot from Goodfellas. Without his approach to soundtracks, his insane editing rhythms, meant to mimic the experience of addiction and intoxication, his use of cinema history as the real, ever-present backdrop of each of his stories, most major American filmmakers would never have had anywhere to take or foment their ideas. Looking at this year alone, it's less important to determine whether Spike Lee, David O. Russell, Alexander Payne, Andrew Bujalski, Paolo Sorrentino, James Gray, The Coen Brothers, Ari Folman, Noah Baumbach, Rob Zombie, Richard Linklater, Gore Verbinski, Paul Greengrass, JC Chandor, Johnny To, Neill Blomkamp, Jeff Nichols, Derek Cianfrance, James Ponsoldt, Alfonso Cuaron or David Lowery owe a stylistic or technical debt to Scorsese and more prudent to say that if Scorsese had never made his films or done what he has for film preservation, production and distribution, who would have their eyes cast in the direction of their movies? The presence of three film directors in the cast of Wolf speaks volumes about his influence. He set the stage in a lot of ways, even if he didn't do it alone. I'm glad as anything that he has because when you have a landscape shaped by the above directors, it becomes all too clear what Scorsese still brings to the table as an artist. If some of the smartest critics in the world have a hard time saying something distinct about his newest work it's because all year we've been given a steady diet of cinema ranging from 30-80% purity. The Wolf of Wall Street is 96% pure blue meth, Heisenberg levels. If it's tough to articulate why it's so good, it's because we're all still very fucked up. 

There are a few keys to Scorsese and Schoonmaker's success. Leonardo DiCaprio doing the best work of his career, for one. That movie star charisma is put to the ultimate test as he's seen doing everything from tossing dwarves to snorting cocaine off of multiple prostitutes to punching women in the stomach. It's, ironically enough, a complete go-for-broke performance requiring not just that he undergo physical humiliation but abandon all sense of himself, right down to his motor skills in the already infamous Lemmons scene in which he suffers indignities more closely associated with Daffy Duck or Homer Simpson than a heartthrob Oscar nominee. DiCaprio proves himself both one of the most attractive leading men and one of the most gifted physical comedians alive in this film. In order to not walk out of the theatre (and many did when I saw it), you had better be thoroughly intoxicated by his presence and he pulls out all the stops. Wolf is fittingly Scorsese's most frenzied film since The Departed but far more is allowed to transpire during the quieter moments. DiCaprio has an added challenge at his feet in that he has to do all the groundwork that he split with Matt Damon in The Departed (a lot of info and personality dumped in our lap in a very short amount of time), but luckily this means we get more opportunity to know and like him, as well as understand his circumstances when the film grants us a reprieve from the whirlwind rise to power at the heart of the story. Slowing down also means really thinking about what exactly DiCaprio's antihero, Jordan Belfort, is actually doing to himself and others. He gets divorced in the quiet moments, he misjudges people in the quiet moments, he tries and fails to explain himself, to justify his actions when he doesn't even believe what he's saying. When the drugs wear off, when the party stops for longer than a second ("Three years later he killed himself. Anyway..."), Belfort realizes how hollow life is. Consequently when the film slows down, something awesome happens. We start to miss the momentum of the drug-fueled orgies that Belfort orchestrates. We miss the chaos and debauchery. We miss the lies as much as he does, because it's rendered in the most seductive terms. It may be Goodfellas or The Departed multiplied by a few dozen, as far as the speed and the violent, bacchanalian highs (or lows, I guess) are concerned, but there's another reason it works. 

When Scorsese made Hugo in 2011 he used modern, shiny CGI-heavy grammar to pay homage to the birth of cinema and storytelling at 24 frames per second. He went to the future to write a loveletter to the past. Rewind a bit to Shutter Island, where he used the language of horror films from 1958-2008 to remake his favourite black-and-white horror films. He remade Bedlam and The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari using colours he borrowed from The Horror of Dracula and craft familiar to fans of Wolf Creek, Zodiac and The Strangers. The result was heady brew less concerned with selling its nonsensical story than in celebrating 80 years of horror. The Wolf of Wall Street walks down that same staircase in RKO studios where Cat People was filmed, back when it was the Magnificent Ambersons staircase. I like to think that Wolf was a response to Citizen Kane being knocked off the Sight & Sound best films of all time top spot, because Orson Welles' fingerprints have been planted all over the joint. This is, to me, the secret to the film's success. Scorsese occasionally apes some of Welles' off-kilter compositions and maybe he borrows some of his editing tricks but I was too close to the screen and too sucked in to really pay attention. What I do know is there's a beautiful crib from Ambersons when Kyle Chandler's FBI agent enters DiCaprio's house for the first time. Scorsese may still be a student but damn if he doesn't act like a professor when he wants to. As in the Copa sequence, here's the whole film in four shots. DiCaprio stands at the top of the stairs, a dutch tilt bridging the distance between himself and the FBI agents who've come for him. A close-up of an incriminating note, paper the cause of his downfall, a reverse shot of DiCaprio, completely alone, leaning on the bannister. Then the dutch tilt again as the agents ascend the stairs, obliterating the distance between DiCaprio and Chandler, the rich and the working class. His ivory tower is an illusion, penetrated, a staircase climbed in mere seconds.

Belfort himself is a mix of Charles Foster Kane as a young man (the glee, the twinkle in his eye "I think it would be fun to run a newspaper") and Professor Charles Rankin from The Stranger. Scorsese and DiCaprio fuse the two men, tearing the guts out from under Welles' dashboard and hotwiring the narrative engine. Like Kane, Belfort's corrupted by privelege and boundaries he can too easily cross. Like Rankin, he arrives with his ambition and we don't get much of a backstory to explain away his actions. We're not meant to necessarily approve of Kane, but we are supposed to like him until nearly the bitter end. We slowly learn to hate and pity him because everyone else does. Rankin, by contrast, is revealed to be the villain fairly early on and the only reason we want him alive is because he's interesting and poor Loretta Young, the character we identify with, is smitten (and yes, that does make us Loretta Young once Belfort's first wife exits the film). We don't ever see their humanity laid bare because our perspective is limited. What we see is what everyone around them sees. We can see Rankin from Young's perspective and get a good idea as to why she could have fallen for the man that Edward G. Robinson's Mr. Wilson sees as pure evil. Kane, meanwhile, is the ultimate exercise in perspective. We only get him as others see him and think they know him. Welles shoots himself perpetually observed; Kane never gets a POV shot because we're never meant to know him. Scorsese has crossbred the 'best' films of all time. In Vertigo, the film that knocked Kane out of the number 1 spot, the film is all told from the perspective of Jimmy Stewart's P.I. Scotty, until finally he leaves the room and we're left with alone with Madeleine, the object of his desire, obsession and scrutiny as she looks into a mirror and we fianlly see her as she sees herself, as Scotty wants to see her. Scorsese does the same thing, but he does it to his Charles Foster Kane/Henry Rankin stand-in. We look into the mirror with Belfort, but more importantly we look out at the world with him and see what he sees. If we couldn't, we wouldn't follow him. 

Kane is filmed like a monolith. Belfort gets those moments but the key to his success and his taking the audience with him are the reverse shots where he stand behind Belfort seeing what he sees. How do you say no to success when it's hundred eyes are staring at you, hanging on your every word. The film puts us behind the podium and looks out into the crowd that Welles didn't have the money to fill out with extras. We realize why, in those moments, he couldn't say no, he couldn't stop swindling, getting high, and ruining lives. Gods must rarely feel as high as Belfort and his maniac crew did at the height of their powers. They could buy anything and did because it made their reign more real than the last purchase. Scorsese puts the money, the drugs and the sex at our fingertips. I know I didn't want the fun to stop and I'm a fucking communist. 


I believed in all of it. Just as there's nothing Belfort can't buy, there's nothing Scorsese will spare us, no corridor he won't venture down for the sake of find some new thrilling piece of language. The best innovation, and the most organic outgrowth of his body of work: drugs, alcohol and women will combine, time will all but stop like one of Kathryn Bigelow's exploded microseconds in The Hurt Locker, and the blues that Scorsese has gone out of his way to become associated with, specifically the refrain from that shot of aural whiskey Howlin' Wolf's (who else?) "Smokestack Lightnin'" will echo like it's being played from the inside of a tornado. (Digression: Like Belfort, Wolf was as famous for his appetites as he was for his career and had a habit of letting his performances get out of hand. Scorsese does treat these men as hard-living rockstars and this film is a much better movie about what it must have been like recording hits for Chess Records than the movie Cadillac Records). I've been replaying those moments in my head every ten minutes since I left the theatre. A plane full of brokers having sex with a veritable armada of prostitutes aboard a private jet, sudden turbulence and like that the air is thick with cocaine and nude bodies careening into each other in the slowest slow-motion you can imagine. Until this moment in time such a feat could not have been carried out to this effect and it feels like nothing short of a curtain pull on a new age of art. One can argue cinema was meant for greater things but I hasten to remind you that Vertigo is about a man who won't let death get in the way of sexual obsession and Citizen Kane follows roughly the same trajectory as The Wolf of Wall Street, a rags-to-riches tale of a man discovering he has no time to cultivate a soul, leaving billions of dollars, useless possessions and defeated women in his wake. Perhaps there are nobler pursuits than getting us to identify with the worst people on earth for three hours, but nobody cooked purer cinema this year. Scorsese, like we happy addicts who gladly consume his product year after year after year, always tries to say something new and I'll be goddamned if he hasn't done it. 

The '68 Comeback Special: Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush

Here it is. The worst film of the '68 Cannes Film Festival. David Cairns, gallantly undertaking the challenge with me, knew this day would come. Wisely, he challenged me to a game of logic in order to see which of us would have to review it. Naturally I accepted and on the day some men in a van pulled up and threw a canvas bag over my head. They drove me around the Bucks County area for several hours blasting Neil Diamond at a deafening volume until I relented and agreed that anything would be better than that. What I failed to see was that the real test David had set for me was not to show up at all. Clever bastard. He always has the endgame in sight. So with a heavy heart, I returned once more to Clive Donner's Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush. 



To the strains of one of the very worst movie theme songs (an already ignominious category) ever composed, by "Stevie Winwood and Traffic" a boy rides around on a bike, but he's quickly replaced with poorly solarized scenes of grabbed asses and skin and horrid fabric rubbing against one another like blind rhinoceros. Stevie would become Steve as a way to distance himself from the crime he helped commit.  Clive Donner wasn't so lucky. He had his name on a proto-Director's Guild roster, preventing him from making pictures in Chile under the assumed name Carlos Tegulchipec-Whizzington. He tried but they stopped him at the airport and sent him home to think about what he'd done. He tried again three hours later and they handcuffed him to a radiator. Not his radiator, mind you. This is all information I've culled from the very helpful, entirely fictitious making-of book Don't Carry On, Clive by Ted Rumsfjord, former columnist for the Lancashire Nooner until his dismissal for having written the book and thus having something, anything to do with the movie Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush. Everyone who came near it suffered or had to do backflips to avoid suffering. As it should be. The film is ghastly, a candy-coloured rubbing of our collective nose in the sticky awful of England's rampaging teenaged id. It's no less horrible an experience than sleeping in a porn-happy 16 year old's bed after he's been instructed not to change his sheets for eight months. You there yet? It's like sitting in a girl's dorm toilet, unable to move or speak, while listening to the sound of the boy's dorm on headphones. I could go on. It's a film that feels like the Dorian Gray of the Swinging Sixties London. Every face looks like battered fish before it touches the scalding hot oil that will render it delicious. Every song has none of the edgy beauty brought by wonderful cads like Jimmy Page, David Gilmour or Keith Moon. The Spencer Davis Group is not The Yardbirds. They aren't even The Strawberry Alarm Clock. And Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush is no The Knack...and How To Get It.

From chapter 4, Rumsfjord writes: On set Donner receives script pages from a messenger boy on a bike. The boy doffs his cap revealing two glowing horns. The boy's laughter as he rides off, an echoing husk far deeper than the boy's years suggest him capable of, will haunt Donner anytime the producer suggests an extra bottom make it into the shot. Donner reads the pages during a lunch of Gin & Vermouth. Star Barry Evans knocks on the door. Some of the locals had learned what they were up to and chased him up a tree like a cat. Director of Photography Alex Thomson is dispatched to bring him down. Evans would like it greatly if they moved to a safer location. No good, replies Donner, as they've recieved threatening letters from every town for miles. The people of Battersea sent a very vicious missive threatening to sacrifice Vanessa Howard by encasing her in bronze. Just the same Evans insists on changing hotel rooms every night under different names and won't leave Donner's trailer until he agrees. Shooting commences. Production Manager Basil Keys is revealed to be Andreas Baader in disguise and the police are called, but he's gone before they arrive. There's a scuffle when Mike Sarne and his crew ride through town on their way to film Joanna. Donner and Sarne taunt each other from across the town square. The art directors of both films begin throwing punches. Evans hears of the fight  and the budget increases as he demands a series of fake mustaches to be brought to his hotel room every morning for his selection. 

"Screenplay by Hunter Davies, from his novel." What hubris! What gall! He just came right out and took credit for it like it was no big deal! When the authorities came to his door following the London premiere he'd fled to Denmark in a baker's truck. When the truckdriver discovered him, he forced Davies to sit in the dough and be baked along with the bread like Cornel Wilde's benefactor in The Naked Prey. He survived, just barely. He still lives and breathes and puts pen to paper while Dickens, Fitzgerald and Westlake lay dead in the ground, unable to write another word. No less an authority of stuff than John Lennon took a break from shooting rapidfire Heroin and being an asshole to slag off Davies work. One of the first things we hear main person (words like 'actor', 'hero', 'protagonist' just don't seem right under the circumstances) say is "Knickers! I'm knicker-obsessed!" Projectionists across the United Kingdom begin kicking their instruments when they hear that phrase but alas some prints remain intact and play to the end. If you're watching at home in the present and haven't fled to the next room to call your sponsor, you've fixed yourself a tall drink. Whether or not you choose to watch the remaining 90 minutes is a question you and whiskey need to seriously ponder. I went ahead. After several minutes of Barry Evans riding around on his bicycle pontificating like a horrible fucker, I wondered if the whole film took place here on a basketed-tenspeed not unlike that Speed-themed episode of Father Ted. Alas. He gets off the bike and starts hitting on women, real and imagined. I wish desperately a bus had hospitalized him and the rest of the film was in his unconscious, sort of like The Singing Detective. Ha! HAH! Fate laughs in my face as they parade one warmed over type after another, including poor Denholm Elliott (Like Donner, he's long deceased. Coincidence? Who can say...), Judy Geeson, and Adrienne Posta as a cockney version of Nicole 'Snooki' Polizzi from The Jersey Shore. If you're not terrified, you're not paying attention. People lived in fear for years that they'd enter a cinema and the reels would have been switched at random by members of the Red Army Faction and they'd have to watch even the opening seconds of this dire sex farce. The word 'farce' obviously implies that all the door slamming and creeping around in a big house trying to place the right dick in the correct hole during one of the film's many lowpoints is successful. It isn't. You should be deeply ashamed if you thought it was. 

I could continue, give you a play by play of every horrid looking thing Evans eats, every woman who refuses to sleep with him, accompanied by constipated reaction shots and sad trombone, I could trot out the much contested Clive Donner is Hitler argument favoured by many. Clive Donner wasn't Hitler. Of course not. That would be ridiculous. There's proof he could point to but he still felt the need to make a film about how great and heroic a job killing The Fuhrer was just so that during the junket no one could look at the director and say "This film must have been difficult to make, what with you're BEING...Oh, I see...but explain Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush?" He must have heard those words six or seven dozen times throughout the 70s. Mobs of reformed Teddy Boys used to chase him around Salford, newly galvanized into picking up their old hooligan ways by the film, taunting him while waving sharpened canes and umbrellas. "Fink you can get away wivvat Richard Lester pastiche? We'll show you!" I could go on and on and on and on and on...but it's Christmas. Or rather, Boxing Day. So let's take a different path, shall we readers? Let's remember that cinema is a gift, a magical, mystical enchantment capable of curing every malady from a frown to disease (I am legally compelled to point out, yet again, that I'm not a doctor) and just because we're given coal shaped like Mulberry Bush doesn't mean we can't overcome, like the Whos of Whoville. I do think Donner deserves to be remembered for better things. That Hitler movie? It's called Rogue Male and it's really rather good. It's got Peter O'Toole, a performance to be prized in a movie that does deserve it. Lord know he often settled for less but Donner earned the right to put my favourite actor in his film.  So this Boxing Day, don't remember that time your one aunt got so drink she got herself uninvited from future gatherings, remember when you thought everything in the world was under the Christmas tree, including the scripts for those George C. Scott-Dickens adaptations. We take the good with the bad and forget about Vampira, The Nude Bomb, Charlie Chan and the Curse of the Dragon Queen and instead remember that we kinda laughed at What's New Pussycat? Didn't we? Merry Christmas and Box bless us everyone.

The Curious Case of the '68 Comeback Special.

David Cairns tries very hard to have something nice to say about Mike Sarne's Joanna and he has better luck at it than I would have, but let's be honest: Joanna is a very difficult film to love. I remember reading a bit of Paul Schrader's early criticism and found the angry young man even less keen on it than either of us, so we're part of a long, proud tradition of hating this very pompous wash in the waters of trendy stupidness. Note that on the poster below the quote calling it one of the best of the year isn't attributed to anyone, because only a phantom with no stake in our dimension could possibly have the sand to say something that suicidally careless. In a festival that gave us a work by Richard Lester (among his finest, it must be noted), the guardians of the coissette also felt that the appetite of the average festival-goer for brit pop would not be sated by merely one work in that vein, so let in a few more crude imitations. Joanna isn't as bad as they got, but they're a good argument for the auteur-only policy that seems to guide most Cannes these days. Take a look in on David's entry (with a very important guest spot from the good lady wife, her indoors) for a more in depth look at why letting counterfeit auteurism in isn't always the best idea. It's a very entertaining read.

Our Favourite Albums of 2013

Scout Tafoya
1. Besnard Lakes - Until In Excess, Imperceptible UFO
2. Phosphorescent - Muchacho 
3. Gauntlet Hair - Stills
4. Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds - Push The Sky Away
5. Akron/Family - Sub Verses
6. Kadavar - Abra Kadavar
7. My Bloody Valentine - m b v
8. Rogue Wave - Nightingale Floors
9. Flaming Lips - The Terror
10. Uncle Acid And The Deadbeats - Mind Control
11. British Sea Power - Machineries of Joy
12. David Bowie - The Next Day
13. Dirty Beaches - Drifters/Love Is The Devil 
14. Ty Segall - Sleeper
15. Ghostface Killah - Twelve Reasons To Die
16. Austra - Olympia
17. Iceage - You're Nothing
18. Windhand - Soma
19. Okkervil River - Silver Gymnasium
20. Neko Case - The Worse Things Get, The Harder I Fight, The Harder I Fight, The More I love You

Chloe Stewart

1. Wire - Change Becomes Us
2. Moby - Innocents
3. Joan Jett - Unvarnished
4. Elvis Costello & The Roots - Wise Up Ghost
5. Hugh Cornwell - Totem & Taboo
6. Crocodiles - Crimes of Passion
7. Savages - Silence Yourself
8. Pere Ubu - Lady from Shanghai
9. Wymond Miles - Cut Yourself Free
10. Adam Ant - Adam Ant is the Blueblack Hussar in Marrying the Gunner's Daughter



Fox Johnson
1. Neko Case - The Worse Things Get, The Harder I Fight, The Harder I Fight, The More I Love You
2. Kavinsky - Outrun
3. Vampire Weekend - Modern Vampires of the City
4. Daft Punk - Random Access Memories
5. Jake Bugg - Jake Bugg
6. Tegan and Sara - Heartthrob
7. Laura Marling - Once I Was an Eagle
8. Charles Bradley - Victim of Love
9. Arcade Fire - Reflektor
10. Jake Bugg - Shangri La
11. Rush - The Clockwork Angels Tour
12. Justin Timberlake - 20/20 Experience (Part 1)
13. Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds - Push the Sky Away
14. Bob Dylan - Another Self Portrait

Ash Redbone


1. Kurt Vile - Wakin' on a Pretty Daze
2. Steve Gunn - Time Off
3. Widowspeak - Almanac
4. Unknown Mortal Orchestra - II
5. William Onyeabor - Who is William Onyeabor?
6. Bombino - Nomad
7. Midlake - Antiphon
8. Washed Out - Paracosm
9. Savages - Silence Yourself
10. Lumerians - High Frontier
11. Quasimoto - Yessir Whatever
12. Ty Segall - Sleeper
13. Kadavar - Abra Kadavar
14. William Tyler - Impossible Truth
15. Four Tet - Beautiful Rewind


Marissa D'Elia


1. Iron Chic - The Constant One
-Part of the placement of this record at the top of my list stems from my undeniable bias with this band. Iron Chic is and has been my favorite band for the past couple of years. Their records don’t do anything radical, technically or musically speaking, but the way the songs all come together creates a feeling that you really can’t find anywhere else.  That being said, The Constant One was the most ideal progression from their first LP, Not Like This, another record jam-packed with heavy choruses and chill-inducing lyrics. I can’t really find the words to describe the feeling these songs give me.  A must listen for anyone who was ever a fan of Latterman and older (original) pop-punk bands.
2. Beyoncé - Beyoncé
-There are so many reasons why this album is number 2 on my list. As a marketing student, I marvel at the brand that is Beyoncé. A secret album that sold over 80,000 units in the first three hours of its release is enough reason to put this at the top at any AOTY list. With that being said, this album really surprised me.  I love Beyoncé as much as the next person but I never really found that I enjoyed her records as a whole. Every single song on this is completely different from the next with perfect collaborations with Frank Ocean, Drake and Blue Ivy herself. But the most addicting aspect of this album is the strong feminist undertone to a couple of songs, especially “Flawless” which features Nigerian writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adiche. I had watched Adiche’s talk on “Why everyone should be a feminist” so I had heard the excerpt before but somehow the way it was paired with the music made it that much more powerful. If there was ever a time to listen to this beautiful goddess, it’s now.
3. Kelsi Grammar - Being Petty
-The best band you’ve never heard of. That’s really it. This EP slays just as hard as their full-length from 2012. If you aren’t listening to this band you are screwing your entire life up. Gritty. Angsty. Vocals that don’t sound like every other band you listen to.
4. The National - Trouble Will Find Me
-This record is so sad. The National are so sad. I’m so sad. I recently put in on in a car ride with someone who had never listened before and their first reaction was that it sounded like something gloomy from the 80s. I love this because it’s that album you go out of your way to buy the 180 gram vinyl and then put it on and lay in bed all day questioning every decision you’ve ever made.
5. Drake - Nothing Was the Same
6. Marietta - Summer Death
7. Balance and Composure - The Things We Think We’re Missing

8. Iron Chic - Spooky Action EP 
9. Old Gray - An Autobiography


Dan Khan
1. Dirty Beaches - Drifters/Love is the Devil
2. Baths - Obsidian 
3. Arcade Fire - Reflektor 
4. My Bloody Valentine - m b v  
5. Phosphorescent - Muchacho
6. Washed Out - Paracosm
7. Jagwar Ma - Howlin’
8. Fuck Buttons - Slow Focus
9. Deerhunter - Monomania
10. The Besnard Lakes - Until in Excess, Imperceptible UFO
11. Atoms for Peace - Amok
12. Kanye West - Yeezus
13). Eleanor Friedberger - Personal Record
14. Wire - Change Becomes Us
15. Neko Case - The Worse Things Get, The Higher I Fight, The Harder I fight, The More I love You
16. Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds - Push the Sky Away
17. Cults - Static
18. Justin Timberlake - The 20/20 Experience (Part 1) 
19. Smith Westerns - Soft Will
20. Janelle Monae - The Electric Lady

Honorable Mentions:

The National - Trouble Will Find me
Sigur Ros - Kveikur
Black Joe Lewis - Electric Slave
Daft Punk - Random Access Memories
Paul McCartney - New
David Bowie - The Next Day
Beck - Song Reader

Elias Ianacone


1. Drug Church - Paul Walker
2. Deafheaven - Sunbather
3. Nails - Abandon All Life
4. Wives - Wifes EP
5. Anciients - Heart of Oak
6. Full of Hell - Rudiments of Mutilation
7. Pissed Jeans - Honeys
8. Diarrhea Planet -  I'm Rich Beyond Your Wildest Dreams
9. Fuzz - Fuzz
10. All Pigs Must Die - Nothing Violates This Nature
11. (alternate) Besnard Lakes - Until In Excess, Imperceptible UFO

Ashley Tryba


1. My Bloody Valentine - mbv
2. Kurt Vile - Wakin' on A Pretty Daze
3. Pissed Jeans - Honeys
4. Motorhead - Aftershock
5. Mazzy Star - Seasons of Your Day
6. Black Sabbath - 13
7. Sigur Ros - Kveikur
8. Black Flag - What the...
9. Dr. Dog - B-Room
10.  Meat Puppets - Rat Farm




Beccah Ulm
1. Xenia Rubinos - Magic Trix
2. Arcade Fire - Reflektor
3. Neko Case - The Worse Things Get, The Higher I Fight, The Harder I Fight, The More I love You
4. The Knife - Shaking the Habitual
5. Beyoncé - Beyoncé
6. Lady Gaga - Artpop
7. Colleen Green - Sock It To Me
8. Mannequin Pussy - Gypsy Pervert
9. Blouse - Imperium


Lucas Mangum
1. David Bowie - The Next Day
2. Fall Out Boy - Save Rock n Roll
3. Panic at the Disco - Too Rare to Live, Too Weird to Die!
4. Justin Timberlake - The 20/20 Experience (Part 1)
5. Avenged Sevenfold - Hail to the King
6. Black Veil Brides - Wretched & Divine
7. Bastille - Bad Blood
8. Knife Party - Haunted House EP
9. Skinny Puppy - Weapon
10. Arcade Fire - Reflektor
11. Lady Gaga - Artpop

Tim Earle
1. Paramore - Paramore
2. I the Mighty - Satori
3. Kanye West - Yeezus
4. The Wonder Years - The Greatest Generation
5. Eminem - The Marshall Mathers LP 2
6. HAIM - HAIM
7. Vampire Weekend - Modern Vampires of the City
8. Fall Out Boy - PAX AM Days

Noah Lyons


1. MIA - Matangi
2. Chelsea Wolfe - Pain Is Beauty
3. David Lynch - The Big Dream
4. Moby - Innocents

Blair Elliot


1.Goat - Live Ballroom Ritual
2. Blood Ceremony - Eldritch Dark
3. Neko Case - The Worse Things Get, The Higher I Fight, The Harder I Fight, The More I love You
4. Purson - The Circle & The Blue Door
5. The Black Angels - Indigo Meadow
6. Lumerians - High Frontier
7. Bombino - Nomad
8. Lee Ranaldo & The Dust - Last Night On Earth
9. Midlake - Antiphon
10. Wooden Shjips - Back On land
11. Kadavar - Abra Kadavar
12. Blues Pills - Devil Man EP
13. Night Beats - Sonic Bloom
14. Sigur Ros - Kveikur
15. Chelsea Wolfe - Pain Is Beauty
16. Mount Moriah - Miracle Temple
17. True Widow - Circumambulation
18. Mudhoney - Vanishing Point
19. Black Sabbath - 13
20. Charles Bradley - Victim of Love
21. Savages - Silence Yourself
22. Fuzz - Fuzz
23. Anciients - Heart of Oak
24. Besnard Lakes - Until In Excess, Imperceptible UFO

The '68 Comeback Special: Les Gauloises Bleues

Godard rarely gives coherent interviews anymore. His films and his own statements mostly come out the same - beguiling and pointless. You wanna learn why he did anything back in the day, you're shit out of luck. He still has a lot of politique and defensive rigamarole to doll out to whatever unfortunate sod seeks him out for a word or two, but goddamned if I can figure out what drives him to edit his beautiful nonsense anymore. His movies are still totally fascinating but I also won't pretend I know what goes on or that they're 100% or even 65% successful. The unspoken subtext of his overthrowing the Cannes film festival in 1968, which David Cairns and I have been profiling film-by-film, was that he was kissing the kind of trendy stylistic, genre flaunting gymnastics he'd created goodbye. Cinema, such as it was, was now his enemy. That very year he made Un Film Comme Les Autres, which you were meant to flip a coin to determine which reel went first because the images were the same no matter which one you picked. Nobody told me this before I watched the interminable thing, and here I was looking for a story behind all the talk of revolution on the lawn of a car manufacturer. I felt uncomfortable; it felt to me like Godard and his friends were forcing workers to enter into disputes they didn't think needed fighting. The colorful excesses and russian roulette montage of Pierrot Le Fou, Bande à part and Contempt were over. Long live the new flesh and all that. Godard throwing in the towel and picking up a hammer meant a lot for cinema. The french new wave was over, for one thing, and Godard was no longer the reigning champ of cinephilia-inflected cinema. This left a gaping hole which I'm willing to bet every young director yet to be discovered wanted to fill. Philippe Garrel and Jacques Rivette stepped up to the plate and began documenting life in post-68 France with their unique voices, neither wanting to be, nor pretending to be Godard. They were honest and fanciful in new, exciting ways, finding naturalism and surrealism good company. Attemping to be Godard would have been ridiculous. Nobody told that to critic Michel Cournot. 

From what I've been able to divine Cournot wrote criticism throughout the 60s (Thanks to the inestimable David Ehrenstein for his correction on this matter!), but then, what important French director of that age didn't? He apparently had a beautiful voice as a writer. In '67 Godard put him in Weekend, and he liked so much of what he saw on set that he vowed to do that again sometime. To make his first and only film he snagged Annie Girardot, a young Bruno Cremer, and Jean-Pierre Kalfon, all fresh from the Jacques Brel film Bonnot's Gang, and most tellingly Anne Wiazemsky, lately Godard's girlfriend. He once more retreated to a remote countryside location with a camera crew and just like last time Godard was calling the shots. Ok, perhaps that's unfair. Les Gauloises Bleues, the resultant film, is only available in a poorly transferred TV-to-VHS-to-AVI rip and no one's taken the time to translate it into English. Cournot himself said that the script "bears the same relation to the film as a catalogue of plane parts does to a trans-Atlantic flight." Vincent Canby opined that this particular flight was missing a set of functioning wings. My remedial french isn't quite enough to help me sort out what goes on so there's a chance that the film is a completely distinct statement from Weekend and all the rest of le cinema du Godard and a profound statement about the Holocaust to boot (images of bleak railways and a few choice words on walls say he was at least gesturing in that direction).........but there's an equally good chance this is just microwaved New Wave leftovers.

Instead of the bright primary colours of Pierrot and Weekend, Cournot shoots in muted pastels, but his model is unmistakable (even the fake blood, right out of Weekend, seems a duller shade). There are many long takes broken up by soundless inserted clarifying scenes, instead of being thrust into those scenes as we surely would in Godard's hands. There are pointless images shoved in our faces as if to provoke with their having nothing to do with each other. This doesn't really work. Putting an illustration from a Babar The Elephant book after photographs of dead bodies mostly just highlights how much better the trick's been pulled off before. Continuity is routinely flaunted, time is jumped like a velvet rope, and Cournot presents his actors and their emotions with complete irreverence. Cournot also borrows HEAVILY (ok he just fucking steals) from Antonioni's Red Desert and L'Ecclise. I don't want to write off the possibility that in missing out on whatever the plot linking this dour game of pantomimes I'm missing a masterpiece of French deconstructionism, but there just might be a reason Cournot's the one New Wave Director no one's ever heard of. I realize this entry's heavy on hypotheticals which is appropriate even if it can't be all that satisfying to read, so, my apologies.
There are a few ironies at work. Godard's output lately (since 1973 really) has been mostly inscrutable or too oblique for me, but at least they come with subtitles. Les Gauloises Bleues does not because it's never made it past French TV. Why? Very probably because Godard himself (with Gauloises co-writer Claude Lelouch in tow) shut the festival down before it could play. Or maybe Lelouch knew he had co-signed a dreary bit of word-vomit and could have cared less if it ever screened. Conjecture, I know, I know, but the point is we can only point a finger at so many people and Godard's definitely got silver halide on his hands. Les Gauloises Bleues is now just as unreadable and confusing as anything Godard attempted following his post-cinema conversion. Stranger still, not only did Godard cut Cournot's directing career short, he also in essence kept making films with what looks an awful lot like Cournot's softer, still very-compelling image, and too-excitable, too-easy approach to montage. Cournot was doing his best Godard imitation in Les Gauloises Bleues, but all Godard wanted to do was make films that looked and acted like Les Gauloises Bleues. Over and over again. Words, irreverent presentation of people, contempt for coherence and an elastic sense of time, place and genre. It's tempting to think of Gauloises as the missing link between late narrative work like La Chinoise & Weekend and conversational theorems like Un Film Comme Les Autres & Le Gai Savoir (it's not a million miles away from One PM or Tout Va Bien either). 
There isn't an awful lot that I can say beyond my half-guesses and hypothesizing except to say that even denied his words Bruno Cremer is a commanding screen presence. He's one of my favourite actors and he does great work just existing in that anguished, angry way he does. I detect him doing a dry-run for his tough-parent act in Un Jeu Brutal. And there's something everyone can appreciate nestled in here: a mesmerizing score by Krzysztof Penderecki. Penderecki could also be heard amplifying the weird in Je T'aime Je t'aime across the coissette, which weirdly this also kinda resembles. If the film works for me at all, it's his doing. He ignites Cournot's best images and makes you forget they've been cribbed. Those moments, when the image and music work together in a haunting harmony, almost make you wish he'd tried again. 

All there is

This may well be the final entry in David Cairns epic Late Show Blogathon. It's been an immense pleasure taking part and reading all the many-splendored accounts of the final works in many an oeuvre. Take some time and read the other entries. They're fantastic!

Anger may never fade, but it does seem to dull slightly with age. We lose the energy with which we used to run around and tear everything down. Bricks get heavier to carry and we pour reasonable amounts of liquor for ourselves to sip from the bottles we used to light on fire and throw in windows. Or something like that. When I first became a committed cinephile, I fell hard for political cinema. Still love it. Still need it. It took me so long to appreciate classical cinema (I'm fairly certain that if it weren't for David's totally brilliant POV-by-POV exploration of Citizen Kane last month, I'd still wrongly think of that movie as a little too 'good' for its own good. Thanks for that by the way, Dave!) because for so many years I had incredibly harsh criteria for a movie's success. It wasn't enough to be art, it had to have something worth saying, and it needed to say it through a megaphone. Society was falling apart before our very eyes, damnit! We needed to speak up! Stand up or shut up. But that changes. You can't fully appreciate everything cinema has to offer if you never get off your soapbox. Don't you know you're blocking the projector? When I started making films myself I quickly forgot Ken Loach's statement about close-ups turning people into objects, which can be exploited and traded and killed and forgotten. I liked close-ups and I liked The Wind That Shakes The Barley. We can all just get along! Sometimes.

Film school was both the perfect and worst place to explore my conviction. I could quietly (sometimes) sneer and roll my eyes at the empty experiments of my classmates "This is your idea of art?! Upper class hackwork!" But before it ever got to that point, I had a lot of catching up to do. There was a hundred years of film I didn't know enough about. I spent a single semester at Temple University and though I was mostly terrified of the place they did have something very valuable: a library with every single Criterion DVD available for rent. I took out ten at a time, the limit, every week, and watched them all. Friends? Who needs friends? I had Salò! In my hands! To watch! Never in my life did I think I'd get to see it. It was out of print but these bastards had a copy! It for so long (well, the few years I knew about it) had felt like that jewel in any cinephile's crown. I had to wait until my roommate, an Cape Verdean engineer and athlete, was away for the night to watch it in our tiny dorm room. He had put up with Blood for Dracula. I doubt very much he'd have spoken to me again if he caught any given frame of the film's last two thirds. The film's famously tough and it rather defeated me on first viewing. Horrific, sure, but why? Two years later I'd read Gary Indiana's book and was staggered to hear him recount his history with the film. After the first time he saw it, he'd drive home by way of the same theatre every Saturday night for months and watch it....everytime. The passage stuck with even if I'm probably fucking it up. Still. Seeing it multiple times in the same month felt like torment. Was I wrong about the film? 

Of course I was. My mistake was not seeing its mise-en-scène as purposeful. I was still feeling out theory and didn't know any better. Too blinded by the inferno of grotesquery. Pasolini had fallen out of love with sensuality and the human body and the film reflects that. Sexuality is used like gunfire against a bulletproof vest. It hurts but unfortunately it's not going to kill you. Not yet. "All's good if it's excessive." And so every crime against the body imaginable is committed with false glee. The men don't even seem to really enjoy what they're doing, even though their reactions to their crimes is always a mask of elation. It's false. They can't get joy from this. They're like Pasolini, or the Italian elite whose leg he was pissing down. The joy is gone or it's imagined. No one's really happy. What we witness is Pasolini's energy being channelled into a completely new, productive direction. He was angrier than he'd ever been, his art failed him, and his rage seethes beneath every drab frame, colorless wall, every rambling, punishing monologue, every 'excessive' act of depravity. It took quite a lot to stage this anti-facist Grand Guignol, evidence that Pasolini was as passionate as he'd ever been. And then just as quickly as he'd opened this new chapter of his artistic life, it was closed for him. Murdered by a prostitute. Where else might his ambition have taken him? It's tempting to think that, like Bellocchio and Bertolucci, he would have always had some kind of support. But if we look at two of his peers, he may well have found himself resorting to a more personal form of cinema. 

The Criterion Collection released two films at almost the same time a little before I arrived at college, and to this day they'd both make me Sight & Sound poll if you asked me. If Lindsay Anderson's If.... and Dušan Makavejev's Sweet Movie hadn't been put out when they did, if I hadn't rented them the same day and watched them both the same night, I can't help feeling I'd be chasing a different muse. These films helped me learn the importance of film preservation, let me see how color and light could really be used, how sexuality could be expressed cinematically, how perfect and wonderful the human body, flesh, blood, fluids, could be, and how perfectly seductive leftwing fury was. Less importantly my preferred ellipses has four dots. If I fell hard for these films, it's because I fell in love with the anti-establishment lovers, fusing their beliefs and sex and violence in a whirlwind I've never been released from. I already suffered from crippling completism by the time I saw these films and made a point to find everything else by their creators. It took me many years but I've seen everything by both men (exception: Lindsay Anderson's TV play Look Back In Anger with Malcolm McDowell. If you have a lead, do drop me a line. I lost twenty dollars to raremoviedepot.com, who claimed to have it and then never did me the courtesy of letting me know they didn't. I've emailed several times to no avail). I was a little disheartened. Each made a few other spectacular films - Montenegro, O Lucky Man, Innocence Unprotected, The White Bus, Love Affair, Britannia Hospital, W.R. Mysteries of the Organism, This Sporting Life, Manifesto, The Coca-Cola Kid - but nothing that ever recaptured that magic of watching those films for the first time. But then I guess a relationship sometimes pales in comparison to falling in love. 

Both directors eventually ran out of people willing to pay them scads of money to make polarizing films. Anderson fell into taking whatever job came his way and greatly embarrassed himself in the process. His last decent film, the tearjerker The Whales of August (David rightly pointed out that Whales is the perfect late movie, between Anderson behind the camera and Vincent Price, Bette Davis, Lillian Gish, Ann Sothern and Harry Carey, Jr in front of it), is at times so cinematically inert it nearly becomes the kind of British Cinema he so detested. It's incredibly respectful, especially of its aged stars. Too respectful I thought when I first watched it. But even in my anger that Anderson had toned himself down, I couldn't help but be moved. It is a very moving film, no matter how you look at it. But it's not the Anderson I fell in love with. The same is true, to a degree of Makavejev's Manifesto. It does have a little of the old magic in there but it's almost too heart-warming to be as cutting as it could have been. From there? 

In the 90s Makavejev and Anderson made their last films: A Hole In The Soul and Is That All There Is? If you think those sound eerily similar, try watching them back to back. Both films are very gently directed, personal documentaries, one a little more artificial than the other, where the men drift around their home lands, take a passing glance at their legacy and spend time with (and quite coincidentally take boat rides with) old friends. Both look ahead but that look in their eye says they know their best days are behind them. They find the world a bigger place than it used to be. Anderson encounters modern television ads, a rude relation, and the generation beneath him; in essence he lets the audience know that he knows that he's gotten old. His work had gotten crass, compromised: he'd directed a TV miniseries not long before this called Glory! Glory! about a sex symbol used by an evangelist to get converts. It's trash. Uninspired, lacking in wit and charisma. Anderson had grown tired and in Is That All There Is? he as good as admits it. Makavejev never fell as hard on hard times, so he has to less to feel guilty about. His trip is just a little less interesting for it. But neither man asks for pity. Neither throws themself on both knees in despair at what we've become. They don't ask anything of us except maybe...just maybe, we consider looking beneath the sheen of the world around us. New isn't always good. In fact it's easier to couch a lie in 'progress', especially if everyone's doing it. What they ask is that we not forget the past. 

I'll remember one thing from Is That All There Is? until I die myself: Anderson films himself in the bath. I've seen footage of him setting up of that shot. Can you imagine? 71 years old and he freely shows off his aged form hidden only by grey bathwater (is all English water that murky?). I love him for that scene. Here it is: age, death, tomorrow, fear. But it's one of the best images Anderson ever created. He's just a man in that tub, and he's gotten old. We all will. Here's something profound and honest and lovely, even after studios had robbed him of his good name. That's what these essay films allowed these old masters to accomplish. Makavejev and Anderson were once forces to be reckoned with. Makavejev once closed the Berlin Film Festival for heaven's sake! Giant director George Stevens refused to acknowledge Michael Verhoeven's anti-american film Ok! and Makavejev called bullshit on his imperialist ass and the whole festival just stopped. That was politics! That was filmmaking! Then. Now? The early 90s? Dusk falls on their heyday and they make one last, unadulterated statement. No producer to answer to. No story to get right. Just their own. Just them and the crew and their families. If Anderson had lived another ten years I don't know that he would ever set foot behind a camera again. He looks so tired. Makavejev, bless him, is still alive and kickin' at 85 and hasn't made another film. They were always linked by progressive ideology and that beautiful anger and they shared a heartfelt, humble bow in front of just some friends, a few camera technicians and of course me. Like they were writing their life stories with my development in mind, the gracious wonders. They were still mad as hell, but they had let go of enough to look at the world with clear eyes and heads and recognize that their place in it, as filmmakers, had been filled. But they didn't want to go out on a commission. As Martin Sheen says of Brando's Kurtz they "just wanted to go out like a soldier....not like some poor, wasted, ragged ass renegade." So they amble through a narrow corridor in the middle of the present called the past, hoping we'll join them and remember better/worse days. Days when their art made a difference. Days when Pasolini was just getting started. They couldn't know anyone would be watching, let alone writing all this down...

The Subject Was Death

The following is a contribution to David Cairns' Blogathon entitled The Late Show, looking at the final films of actors, directors or any other notable talents. Head on over to Shadowplay to catch up with the happenings and the many brilliant words being spilled over many odd and interesting works in the autumn of many lives. 

Raúl Ruiz spent his whole career making one indelible impression after another. Based on personal accounts I've read and the experience I have with his films, the overwhelming feeling I always got was that he was always just behind you in the cinema smiling at you while you watched what he was up to. You could turn back around, whether through charmed confusion or plain ardor and he'd be there to wink at you, then nod to indicate that you're about to see something better. Even if you don't like his films, how could you not admire him? His movies were always adventures, if perhaps not always naive or traditionally thrilling. Even the byzantine corridors of Mysteries of Lisbon had reveals and reversals that turned an ordinary passage into a grave, bold twist of fate. Sure it's classic literature, but it never forgot to occasionally act like an action-packed serial. 

Naturally he was gone before I had a real opportunity to engage with his body of work. Don't get me wrong, I'm grateful there's a whole canon I get to experience at my leisure but one never likes to view a body of work as an obituary. How could I watch Lines of Wellington and not wonder how it would have turned out if he'd lived to finish it? But the sadness passed as I began watching this missive from a man on his way into the next life. Valeria Sarmiento, Ruiz's great love in life (after the cinema) had stepped up and completed it in his absence and done an absolutely marvelous job. Her hand seemed guided lovingly by the man himself, though no one without great talent could have produced such a splendidly textured work. Perhaps the best way to think of Lines of Wellington is as a wake. Sadness fills the air but there is joy here, and everybody in the world stopped by to pay their respects. One is torn whether to judge it devoid of the departed first author's influence. What is the film if not a tribute to the way Ruiz's camera made us feel, a stunning approximation of his style? I found it a compelling trip down a riverbank with the dead on both sides. What can one do when surrounded by sadness so profound as this, sadness, a lack that has actually produced a film. Lines of Wellington is about surviving. Naturally it's all Sarmiento and the friends of Ruiz can be asked to do, but they've done so much more. I'm incredibly grateful for Wellington. 

Death is the ultimate producer isn't he? You can work to whatever deadline you think you have, craft your life the best you can, roll with the punches, deal with bumps in the road and uncooperative performers, work magic time and again, but the fucker always gets final cut, don't he? Who's ever really ready to let a legacy lie? Francis Ford Coppola has a marvelous zen attitude toward death, I find, but I think secretly he's as nervous as I am. He gave a whole series of interviews around the time of Tetro and Twixt where he talked about death, how he's come up with mechanisms, games, to take the weight out of the event; Take the wind out of death's sails. He would ride an elevator to the bottom floor of his building and in the dark passage between the first floor and the lobby would pretend he would be dead when he hit the bottom. Everything seemed ok in those moments. But now he's out raising money for another mob film. Death can fuck right off, it seems. Three films for no money with no pressure were enough to get all the demons out (they make a hell of a triple feature, they do. Watch them backwards, Twixt, Tetro and then Youth Without Youth and see if you aren't bawling by the finish) and now he's back on the horse. I just know I'm going to be having this conversation with the bastard all my life. There's no playing fair with death. Ruiz's passing strikes me as so marvelously sly because he left after completing what really ought to have been his last film. If I may read into the motivation of someone I will never meet, Lines of Wellington was one more film than Ruiz knew he was meant to make, so he passed it to his loved ones. Is this provable fact? Not at all. It's just the narrative I gave to myself to make his passing seem less cruel, and more a final twist in a narrative Ruiz had been writing since he started making art for kids like me to consume, analyze and fall for. 

I'll tell you the best approximation of grief I've ever encountered: In Bertrand Bonello's marvelously decadent wallow House of Pleasures (oh how I love that film) one of the denizens of a brothel succumbs to syphilis and the other girls are left to mourn her. Quite without warning we're in a dark room dancing with the girls to The Moody Blues' "Nights in White Satin." They're too broken up to speak, they can only sway and sink into each other for unvoiced support. One of them walks up the hall, not hearing the music, peering into the room. Darkness everywhere but for the candle lit bodies in a silken parlor filled with the most marvelous suffering you've ever seen. That is how one wants to mourn. We almost never get to. That is the sort of mourning Ruiz deserves. Sadness that compels one to dance. Perhaps fittingly, perhaps not, I saw Lines of Wellington before La Noche De Enfrente, Ruiz's final complete work as director, just after hearing about his death. Lines is a remarkable film, but it came with the nagging sensation that he wasn't really gone. The wake had been thrown too soon and like Don Juan or Tom Sawyer (or both) he was watching it from a safe distance, smiling just a little wider than he should at the tribute paid to him. He couldn't be gone. He had one more film coming out. 

Thus is the frustrating magic of release dates; they bring the dead back to life. We still have one more James Gandolfini performance to look forward to. What a horrible, bitter hope to give to us. Gone too soon. Everyone always gone too soon for my liking. Thanks to Film Comment, La Noche De Enfrente played New York's Lincoln Center and I got on the first train I could to go see it. The screening was patchily attended, to say the least. There can't have been more than fifteen people in the theatre. I settled in and so did this dreamy vision of life and art holding hands for a long walk down the beach of Ruiz's memory, consciousness, unconsciousness and desire. The first thing that really jumps out: the bit where Bluebeard the pirate talks with a young boy in front of a bluescreen beach. What's that about? Why the artificiality? There are no beaches in Chile? Aha! Forest for the trees. Rookie mistake. This is his version of the Byron Haskin technicolor fables that had invaded his childhood like pirates on a galley. Suddenly I was at a beautiful crossroad: the 24 year old in the theatre wanted to figure out the tricks being played, the 4 year old in the back of my head was intoxicated by the scenes of peculiar logic drifting into each other like rogue brushstrokes. I've been giving a lot of thought lately to what might have been the first film I remember seeing in a theatre. Best I've been able to narrow it down to were kid-friendly rep screenings of Treasure Island (Haskin, naturally) or 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea at the County Theatre in Doylestown, my home all these years. They still show those kid friendly matinees and the world's a better place for it. I remember being enchanted by tales of pirates, of being carried out to sea with a bunch of disreputable characters who you could never spend enough time with. Old Hollywood may have been built on lies but never let anyone tell you it wasn't magic. If I could retire to anywhere in time and space, it'd be to Hollywood in the 50s, because I could go anywhere in the world, do anything, be anywhere. The lies were exquisite back then. You could sink into them, like the girls in House of Pleasures, a similarly anachronistic voyage. Ruiz understands this. He doesn't try to lift us out of dreamland too often, but his last scenes are quite haunting without exerting too much effort. We are in the barrel of a gun for one brief scene after all. Doesn't get any more uncanny than that. 

Ruiz really did direct as if he were orchestrating your dreams. La Noche De Enfrente especially has a "Now you're here. Now you're here. Now this happens" sequencing that is truly the stuff of dreams. People walk from one room to the next, only to discover a whole new plot thread waiting to take them far away from the quiet retirement drink they were just having. Ultimately they shall have little consequence, but you'll wake up believing them. I was in the thick of all this when around the halfway point something drew me ever so slightly from the fantasia. Breathing. I had no memory of anyone coming and sitting behind me, but sure enough there was a low, wheezing sound, the unmistakable husky sound of a slightly sick older man breathing just behind me. For money I would have sworn there was no one there before the lights dimmed. The breathing continued right along with the film. I said nevermind and delighted in the things Ruiz was showing and telling me and it does feel like it's just to you, the viewer, independent of every other viewer. Dreams have that kind of intimacy. A thought strikes me, and I'm regressing to childhood in my seat so I entertain it. Could it be Ruiz seated behind me for one last screening? He seemed to be welcoming death with a joy-buzzer hidden in his palm all throughout the film, what with his conversing with historical figures and mixing his spiritual plains. Is it so far fetched that the man flew here to see his last work at a low-key venue, a small, sparsely attended theatre, someplace a throng won't recognize him. Tom Sawyer is sitting behind me, watching his own film, breathing down my neck. What a trick to play. What a damn good last laugh. It's so beautiful I want to believe it. I can't but I want to. I let the idea float away like pipe smoke to the carpeted ceilings and I settle back in, a little more invested than I was before. 

We want to believe the fairy tales, that we can be abducted by life-loving pirates and into high-seas adventures we'll never forget. The truth, that we could never live the lives of fictional characters, is too painful for us to cope with, which is why we've got movies, isn't it? To paint fantasy with lights and people and words and imagine for a moment we've lived something we haven't. One dream at a time, some good, some bad. The best films can do this to us, anyway. He had a bit of an ace up his sleeve in the form of a 6 hour runtime (!) but when I stopped watching Lav Diaz's Century of Birthing I felt I was still in the Philippines and it would take another round of dreams set somewhere else to wake me from that illusion. That is why we watch, isn't it? Am I being overly optimistic? Childish? Good. I'll never get to be these people, so I want to live their lives for a few hours at a time. I want to go off and live dangerously with the likes of His Majesty O'Keefe, Lord Jim, Robinson Crusoe, John Carter, Mick Travis, Bluebeard the Pirate or even Ruiz himself, lovable character that he is. Was? Is? But one has to grow up, so we get our doses in two hour films and pretend. Next best thing we can do is dream. So when the film ended, I stood up, gathered my things and walked out of the theatre as quickly as possible, taking care not to look behind me, never to know the identity of the man behind me, if indeed I hadn't dreamt him up. Sometimes we need the lie. Death taps his foot, looks at his watch, and waits for the ugly truth to show up. I like the truth, so long as it's given to me in a good film, but I'll take the lie any day. What's the point a dyin' if we don't know what we're gonna miss?